Conclusion

In many cases conclusions are the most difficult part when it comes to writing essays or research papers. While the reader may browse through the paper he/she does not obviously remember the writing points; however he/she pays special attention when it comes to the conclusion. Since the conclusion is the last part the reader perceives it is extremely important in making the entire effect the writing produce. In practice there are several basic tasks that should be reached by the conclusion. It can: Emphasize the significance of the thesis statement; Analyze and synthesize the main idea or each point; Deduce on the topic; Estimate the used material; Give vision of the future developments which may which may happen with the topic issue; Make recommendations; Provide the final impression on the reader. While summarizing the points mentioned in the paper it is important not to repeat the discussed material. The best way to complete the essay is to analyze and synthesize. The reader should sharply comprehend the importance, usefulness and necessity of the paper. An appropriate conclusion guarantees new ideas for the reader to think about and brings the feeling of satisfaction with complete information (look at this one).

Portrayal Of Female Sexuality By Bram Stoker s Dracula Essay

In a particular addition of Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula, Maurice Hindle had suggested that â€Å"sex was the monster Stoker feared most.† This essay will examine the examples of this statement in the Dracula text, focusing on female sexuality. The essay will also briefly look at an article Stoker had written after Dracula which also displays Stoker’s fear. Dracula is a novel that indulges its male reader’s imagination, predominantly on the topic of female sexuality. When Dracula was first published, Victorian women’s sexual behaviour was extremely restricted by social expectations. To be classed as respectable, a women was either a virgin or a wife. If she was not either, she was considered a whore. We begin to understand once Dracula arrives in Whitby, that the novel has an underlying battle between good and evil, which will hinge on female sexuality. Both Lucy Westenra and Wilhelmina â€Å"Mina† Murray embody two-dimensional virtues that have been associated with female. They are both virgins, whom are innocent from the evils of the world and that are devoted to their men. Dracula’s arrival threatens those virtues, threatening to turn Lucy and Mina into the opposites, noted for their voluptuousness, which could lead to an open sexual desire. Dracula succeeds in doing so with Lucy. After Lucy herself becomes a vampire, she requests a kiss from Arthur Holmwood, her fiancà ©e, which turns voluptuous – a word Stoker continually uses throughout. Here Stoker presents the female charactersShow MoreRelatedPortrayal Of Female Sexuality By Bram Stoker s Dracula1598 Words   |  7 PagesBram Stoker’s 1897 Dracula is a novel that condemns liberated female sexuality, presenting it as volatile and threatening to the established patriarchal order of the Victorian Era. By examining the varying level of sexuality among Stoker’s female characters and their narrative outcomes, the novel’s attitude that female sexuality is hostile becomes apparent. In Castle Dracula, Harker meets three vampiric women whose monstrosity is presented as inseparable from their eroticism. Describing their fangsRead MoreBram Stoker s Dracul Victorian Men And Women1455 Words   |  6 PagesKatherine Fulmer ENGL 3023 Dr. Lawrence 1 December 2015 Bram Stoker’s Dracula: Victorian Men and Women 1. Introduction Bram Stoker’s world famous novel Dracula, blurs the lines between Victorian ideal gender roles by using strong central female characters, such as, the three vampire sisters, Lucy and Mina, to express a powerful female sexuality challenging the Victorian notion of what makes a woman. The Victorian society placed women in a bubble of sexual purity and fragileness, making men the centralRead MoreSuch a Beast: Sexuality and Humanization in Dracula1611 Words   |  7 PagesOver the course of cinematic history, many filmmakers have attempted to recreate the chilling, unprecedented world of Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Arguably very few have succeeded, for the majority of directors tend to avoid the pervasive sexuality inherent in the novel. It is a difficult task to achieve, considering the blatant imagery surrounding sex and vampirism, such as the reproduction following a vampiric encounter and the phallocentric nature of the violence committed both by and against theseRead Mor eComparing Bram Stoker’s Dracula and the 1972 Film Blacula Essay1917 Words   |  8 PagesBram Stoker’s Dracula is not only a classic story of men and monsters, but a dramatic reactionary work to the perceived threats to Victorian society in nineteenth century England. In modern times there have been many film adaptations of the novel, each developing a unique analysis or criticism of the literary text within the framework of the society and time period in which it was created. The 1972 film Blacula is one of the most culturally specific variations on the story of Dracula, and highlightsRead MoreDracula And The New Woman1992 Words   |  8 PagesDracula and the New Woman In the Victorian era, women were viewed as subordinate to men. They often had one job: reproduction. They would become housewives and cater to their husband and children’s needs. As the era progressed, so did the role of women. The once shy women were now changing into courageous and outspoken members of society. These women were open about their sexuality and embraced their intelligence. This new found independence was a turning moment in history and was given the nameRead MoreEnglish Source Doc.7581 Words   |  31 PagesTitle: Dracula: Stoker s Response to the New Woman Author(s): Carol A. Senf Publication Details: Victorian Studies 26.1 (Autumn 1982): p33-49. Source: Nineteenth-Century Literature Criticism. Ed. Jessica Bomarito and Russel Whitaker. Vol. 156. Detroit: Gale, 2006. From Literature Resource Center. Document Type: Critical essay Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning Full Text:   [(essay date autumn 1982) In the following essay, Senf contends that, contraryRead MoreTexts Can Be Modified or Appropriated to Suit Different Audiences or Purposes, Yet Still Remain Firmly Within the Genre. Discuss Stoker’s ‘Dracula’ and at Least One of the Films You Have Studied.1050 Words   |  5 Pageswithin the genre. Discuss Stoker’s ‘Dracula’ and at least one of the films you have studied. FW Murnau’s 1921 film Nosferatu is an appropriation of Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel Dracula. Despite it being an appropriation, explicit gothic conventions remain evident, which explore societal fears and values. These fears and values differ from Dracula, due to distinct contextual influences of different time periods. Stoker’s novel Dracula, presents the fear of female promiscuity, for which vampirism isRead MoreComparing Vampire And The Vampire Diaries1660 Words   |  7 Pagescultural phenomenon would not have happened without Dracula. Without Bram Stoker’s novel, there would be no stereotypical vampires that capture the culture’s conscious. Aside from telling a story on vampires, Dracula also explores ideals about the women of the time in which it was written, which is the Victorian Era. Throughout the Victorian period, one of the predominant concerns was the role of women and the place they fill in their society. Dracula is one of many Victorian novels that explore theRead MoreEssay on Gothic Fiction2923 Words   |  12 Pagesfiction is erotic at the root according to Punter. From your reading of Frankenstein and Dracula how far would you agree with Punters interpretation. Gothic fiction is erotic at the root according to Punter. From your reading of Frankenstein and Dracula how far would you agree with Punters interpretation. In your essay you should consider: - · The authors portrayal of eroticism and sexuality (in all its forms) through characters. - · Relevant social/cultural concerns duringRead MoreThe Angel Of The House1756 Words   |  8 PagesMina says herself before Dracula comes into her life that â€Å"[she] [has] been working very hard lately, because [she] [wants] to keep up with Jonathan’s studies [and when they] are married [she] shall be able to be useful to Jonathan† (Stoker 53). Even before Dracula’s threat becomes imminent, she works only to help Jonathan and not for herself (Mai 30). Through this analysis, it seems as Mina’s work in organising the text is permitted by a contemporary discourse, Bram Stoker nonetheless â€Å"felt the need

A Royal salute to common wealth free essay sample

When the British Empire and all of its colonies was broken up after the Second World War, the organization, the Commonwealth union, was founded. The organization consists of 54 independent member countries that are linked together by a common history and set of values, but by time the Commonwealth has been criticized for being an outdated and meaningless organization based on oppressive values. In his article â€Å"A royal salute to the Commonwealth† (2011), Peter Oborne responds the critique and gives an image of how an important and powerful role the Commonwealth will play in the future. Peter Oborne start commenting on Duke William and Duchess Kate’s first visit to Canada. Oborne followed them on their royal holiday when they visited Canada’s National War Memorial. The monument remembers the Canadian troops during the First World War and the Second World War, where they fought along with the British. Oborne perceive this visit as an affirmation of the still consisting link, which can be seen as a direct result of the Commonwealth union, between Canada and Britain. We will write a custom essay sample on A Royal salute to common wealth or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page After the Second World War when the British Empire broke down, the Commonwealth union was founded as an organization. The former colonies agreed to enter into a united organization with the purpose based on democracy and human rights but because of the financial crisis, these unions have been under a lot of pressure in the recent years. Oborne argues that the political leaders of Britain must realize how applicable the union is to play as an alternative and important part in politics worldwide. Osborne? s main accusations are that the leaders of Britain the past years have ignored their obligations to the Commonwealth union. According to Oborne the British leaders had their difficulties of accepting the Commonwealth because they see it as an expression of the former imperialism â€Å"For many years it has been automatic in progressive circles to sneer at the Commonwealth as a meaningless relic of our imperial past† (l. 19-20). Oborne sees this as an expression of aversion to face the country’s history. According to Oborne, the UK have ignored the relationship with the Commonwealth because the leaders have been busy acting lapdog for the U. S.  and the EU which for many years has emerged as the world’s most significant powers. â€Å"But I would argue that it is Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s poodle-like relationship with the United States, and the former’s slavish worship of the European Union, that now looks out of date† (l. 28-29). But Oborne sees an opportunity. As a result of the economic crisis, the U. S. and the EU today is under enormous pressure, and according to Oborne these former superpowers no longer will play such a dominant role in the future. This will provide space for alternative power structures such as the Commonwealth. In trying to explain his message, Oborne builds his argumentation on words, appeals and symbols of a special kind. First of all he uses negative loaded words in order to describe the British politicians, words like â€Å"The Commonwealth never fitted into New Labour’s relentless modernising vision. Blair regarded traditional British values and identities as xenophobic, if not racist† (l. 23-25) and when he describes the Commonwealth, he uses positive words connected to freedom, strength and democracy such as â€Å"Such is the invisible strength of the Commonwealth, the association of independent countries†. Furthermore, Oborne uses rhetorical features ex. logos, which appeals to the reader’s intellect and sense of logic, when he uses true facts that supports his cause: â€Å"Consider the facts: just under two billion people, approximately one third of the world’s population, live in Commonwealth countries† (l. 31-32). Oborne also uses pathos when he mentions the crown prince couple, William and Kate, as a symbol of the Commonwealth. Using something as extremely popular in Britain as William and Kate appeals to the readers’ emotions and feelings. In this way Oborne borrows the extremely popular couple to make his point: â€Å"The crowds who have flocked to see William and Catherine are surely sensing this profound link between our two nations† (ll. 10-11). It is clearly that the purpose of Oborne’s article is to criticize the British leaders. He criticizes them for their ignorance of the Commonwealth and he wants the readers to realize how great the union could play on the worldwide political stage. Oborne argues that the Commonwealth will come to play a major worldwide political role in future, but can the union do anything against the great powers such as China and the U. S? I highly doubt so. And does it actually even matter if the royal crown prince people makes an official visit to one of the Commonwealth country? What if they just visited Canada for pure pleasure? Either way the Royals should not interfere in politics at all, that is not their purpose. But who knows what will happen if the U. S and the EU looses their role as dominating factors of power after the financial crisis. The World’s power structures would turn upside down and we would have to face the future with new, powerful countries like India and China. At this highly hypothetical moment, the Commonwealth Union might come at handy after all.

The Sunflower free essay sample

A fact which we all have to emit is that humanity existence always creates conflicts and fighting which we call WAR. In war, people kill each others for many reasons - resources, personal benefits, territories, powers, revenge, etc. In war, one becomes a hero for killing human lives and eventually he gets honored and well-known in peoples heart. The Holocaust, according to Germans, was the war between Germans and Jews. Approximately six million Jews included 960,000 innocent children died during Hitlers regime called Nazism. Unlike the hero(s) whom people honor, the Holocaust was a hideous crime and the participants were bloody murderers. Today people are taught about the Holocaust and learn how to avoid it. Many books written about the Holocaust have published and people read and respond. Written by Simon Wiesenthal, a Holocaust survivor, The Sunflower has challenged many readers throughout the world about human responsibility, compassion, and justice with the question about forgiveness, You are a prisoner in a concentration camp. We will write a custom essay sample on The Sunflower or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page A dying Nazi soldier asks for your forgiveness. What would you do? I have thought about the question and seek for the answer for a long time. Finally I find myself in the position that compassion is more important than justice under such a circumstance. I would forgive the dying SS soldier because I feel like nothing is more important than his repentance. There are two other major factors that help me to decide to forgive the dying SS soldier which are peer pressure and his naiveness. I am just a normal person who does not believe in any superhuman being. However I have learned about different religions and they share the same common lesson about compassionmercy is sometimes more important than justice. They forgive sinners who genuinely repent. I would forgive Karl because he finally showed repentance before he died. In our religion repentance is the most important element in seeking forgivenessAnd he certainly repented said priest Bolek to Simon Wiesenthal (The Sunflower 83). Karl was a good person; he was not born a murderer. According to his mom, he was always a good man who never done anything wrong. And that was basically what Karl said before his deathI was not born a murderer (The Sunflower 31). Facing the death, a person would never tell a lie because there is nothing to lie about and there is no need to lie. Karl recognized his crime while he was in hospital and he knew that he was guilty. His dilemma comes not only because the dying SS man asks for forgiveness, but also because he genuinely seems to recognize his crime and guilt. This recognition, if nothing else, is an important first step. says Sven Alkalaj (The Sunflower 103). Everyone makes mistake but not all recognizes his/her guilt. For me, Karl is deserved to be forgiven because he makes mistake and he repents (for some people Karls mistake was unforgivable). Simon Wiesenthal did not full believe that the dying soldier was confessing. Was he better than othersor did the voices of SS men change when they were dying? he wondered. As I mentioned earlier, a dying person can only tell the true and Karl was truely confessing as he said Look, those Jews died quickly, they did not suffer as I dothough they were not as guilty as I am. Karl believed that God was punishing him because he was so much guilty. That was why GOD did not let him die (as quick as the Jews) but made him suffered. Simon Wiesenthal left the room without saying a single word because part of his heart was not certain how to answer the dying SS man. I sense that Mr. Wiesenthals silence meant to forgive Karl. Cardinal Franz Konig, a responder in The Sunflower, also states, Even though you went away without formally uttering a word of forgiveness, the dying man somehow felt accepted from you; otherwise he would not have bequeathed you his personal belongings. Mr. Wiesenthals compassion wanted to forgive the dying man but he thought he didnt have the right to grant forgiveness in the name of other dead Jews. In other words if Karl wanted to be forgiven, he then must ask the Jews, who were killed, for absolution. But who was to forgive him? I? Nobody had empowered me to do soI have no power to forgive him in the name of other people said Mr. Wiesenthal (The Sunflower 82). However, Karl seemed like treating Mr. Wiesenthal as a representative of Jews. He wished forgiveness from a member of Jews community and thats enough for him to leave the world in peace. Those Jews who were killed would not be able to answer Karl. So it must depend on people who are still alive to grant forgiveness for Karl. Death is the end; a murderer is human. Let me forgive the dying repented soldier so he could rest in peace. Karl voluntarily joined the Hitler Youth because he was naive and lack of life experience so that he was convinced by false information provided by the Nazis easily. Karl joined the Hitler Youth when he was twenty one years old. Before that he did not care much about the world around him. As he mentioned, Otherwise all I knew about the Jews was what came out of the loudspeaker or what was given us to read. We were told they were the cause of all our misfortunesThey were trying to get on top of us, they were the cause of war, poverty, hunger, unemployment (The Sunflower 40). Radio news, propagandas, newspapers provided false information about the Jews so that the Germans will treat the Jews badly because they all believed that Jewish success was the reason why Germany went down. It was Karls fault to join the Hitler Youth and became a murderer. People also blame him because he did what he knew was wrong. Yet he was just a young soldier without knowledge about the Jews; and a soldier must follow the orders. Let people blame the leaders instead of the soldiers who did not even have the right to refuse orders. Eventually Karl confessed with the images of the mother and the father jumped out with their child from a building which was set on fire. Again confession should deserve absolution. Peer pressure is another important element that brought Karl into Nazi regime. Karl was young high spirit and wanted to be part of the country, so he simply joined the army with his friends and other youths. Actually Karl was force do to something that he didnt want to do. The Platoon leader and his comrades had the tendency to know what they should do, and Karl should do what they were doing. You and your sensitive feelings! Men, you cannot go on like this. One must be hard! They are not our people. The Jew is not a human being! The Jews are the cause of all our misfortunes! And when you shoot one of them it is not the same thing as shooting one of usits doesnt matter whether it is a man, woman, or child, they are different from us. Without question one must get rid of them. If we had been soft we should still be other peoples slaves,(The Sunflower 49) There was no way for Karl and his comrades go against the orders. Some might force themselves to believe what the leader said because these soldiers are patriot to their country. They just did what the leader said without knowing that they were used as tools for killing. Naiveness and peer pressure can be forgiven because. Let think in other way that Karl was also a victim of Adoft Hitler when he became a murderer because it was not what he wanted to do in the Nazi. In other words, Karl and other soldiers were trapped to become soldiers. Most of them were brainwashed. Many people blame Karl for keeping being a murderer, didnt stop the crime. It was too late for him to quit by the time he knew what he was forced to do. He already joined the army and even his life or his parents lives might be threatened if he did not obey the orders. Karl did not think cleverly because of his naiveness and he chose a wrong way to go with other Germans youths even though he didnt want to go. Those leaders were actually true murderers. People should blame these leaders but not soldiers. Dith Pran was a survivor in the Cambodian Holocaust. He related the Cambodian Holocaust as same as the Germany Holocaust. I could never forgive and forget what the top leaderships of the Khmer Rouge had done to me, my family, or friendsI blame the dozen leaders, the brains behind a sadistic plot, who orders the death of millions of people, including the disabled, children, religious people, the educated, and anyone who they thought was a threat to their ideasPulling away from the Khmer Rouge leadership, I can forgive the soldiers of the Khmer Rouge, those who actually did the killing, although I can never forget what they did. Placed in Simon Wiesenthals position, I would have forgiven the soldier. Dith Pran explained that the soldiers were taught to kill. Most of them were uneducated or poor. They were brainwashed. Their lives, even their families lives, would be in danger if they didnt follow the orders. They were forced to kill (The Sunflower 230). The sunflowers grew on graves of those SS murderers were symbol of forgiveness. Each sunflower heads up toward the sun represented the SS soldier seeking for a brighter future (maybe the future in Karls). Forgiveness is the willingness to overcome the past and accept confession to show mercy. I think the key to forgiveness is understanding. said Dith Pran (The Sunflower 232). Forgiveness comes from peoples heart, from the compassion. It doesnt mean to forget because if people forget the atrocities, it might happen again in the future. The Dalai Lama also stated that people should forgive the person who committed the crime but dont forget about it. The dying SS soldier in The Sunflower was deserved to forgive because he genuinely repented. It is not quite right to blame him for his action because he was young, naive, and he was under peer pressure. He finally paid for his action. Newtons third law states that for every exerted force, there is always an equal reaction force. Let me rel ate this law to the fact that Karl killed Jews (exerted force) and he eventually died in his young age (reaction). People should open their heart to accept Karls repentance and give him a chance to make up in his other world. Let the compassion remains forever. Word Cited The Sunflower free essay sample A novel is formed and influenced by the way in which it is written. In The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal, the structure of the novel dictates the way in which we process our thoughts and emotions about the novel and helps us to better understand the complexities in the novel by having multiple ‘voices’ explain the various aspects of the novel to us from various points of view. In the first part of the novel, we have the story about Simon Wiesenthal’s journey through the Holocaust and after that we have the symposium, a collection of entries by acclaimed people around the world who give their input on the novel and how they view the issues and moral dilemmas which are faced in the novel. This structure and point of view helps us to better understand the novel in terms of what Simon Wiesenthal believes about forgiveness, the views of three others in the symposium and how they help us to make an informed decision about forgiveness. We will write a custom essay sample on The Sunflower or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The first part of the novel is the story of what Simon Wiesenthal went through in the Holocaust and builds us up to the point at which the Nazi, Karl, asks him for forgiveness, at which point we can make our decision about what he could have or should have done in this situation. As it is in his point of view, we could see this as having bias on the novel, but it also helps us to better understand the context of the novel. The context helps us to make an informed decision about forgiveness. As Simon Wiesenthal explains, he was moved around from place to place, and while having to deal with the physical labour of what he would go through day-to-day with sheer amount of work that is required at a work camp as well as having to deal with the psychological and mental burden of the situation he was in. He would often listen to his campmates who would talk about their dire situation such as when he felt that everyone had lost hope as he said â€Å"but I knew that he would not go, he too had lost all feeling for death† when he asked a doctor to look at a dying prisoner, but the doctor would not go and he lost hope for himself and for everybody in his situation because he showed that everyone was immune to death and thus were not afraid of it and wouldn’t feel bad if they succumbed, because they felt that they were in such a tragic position, as shown by his thoughts about a doctor not helping som eone because he thought that it was hopeless. This illustrates the dark theme and context of the novel as it is shown to set up a scene of hopelessness and this relates to his attitude towards forgiveness in the novel. He purposefully displays his  apathy towards giving a pardon towards the Nazi soldier as he is called over to supposedly give him his last wish. This is shown by him saying that â€Å"Of course it is soon to die I thought, but did the Nazis ask whether our children whom they were about to gas had ever had anything out of their life?† He displays his attitudes towards absolving the Nazi as he questions whether or not remorse was ever shown both ways and not just in this situation, which ultimately lays an undertone for his response, which was to say neither sorry, nor I can’t apologise to you, as he both feels he cannot say sorry, as for the aforementioned quote and that because of his situation in that he was dying he felt that he couldn’t not apologise. The introduction and first part of the novel provide us with the setting and context of the novel, as it is a hopeless time for people like Simon Wiesenthal and for him, he is questioning his existence as well as the right for him to absolve a person whose comrades would not have thought twice about killing an innocent person. This predicament is explained by entries in the symposium, the second part of the novel. The three entries into the symposium that help us to make decisions about the novel, among others, are The Dalai Lama, Abraham Joshua Heschel and Primo Levi. The Dalai Lama believes that one should forgive the person or persons who have committed atrocities against oneself and mankind. He believes that we should forgive but not forget. He also relates an example of his experiences that are almost perfectly relatable and comparable to Simon Wiesenthal’s story and experience. I think it has value, especially not-forgiving part, but the fact that the experiences correlate, we appreciate his contribution more. I would ask if there were any limits to this and what he would do if he knew someone was unforgiving. This point of view is about forgiving and not forgetting and suggests that everyone should be absolved of their crimes. Abraham Joshua Heschel’s views are almost aligned with mine as I feel that forgiveness can only be between the perpetrator and the victim. This has value because it is like Simon Wiesenthal’s case, in that he tells a story of a salesperson who offends a common man, who turns out to be a rabbi, so when the man asks for forgiveness, the Rabbi tells him to apologise to a common man and not him because he only offended a common man. In summary of Abraham Joshua Heschel’s point, he says â€Å"No one can forgive crimes committed against other people. It is therefore preposterous to assume that anybody  alive can ext end forgiveness for the suffering of any one of the six million people who perished.† Abraham Joshua Heschel views forgiveness as something that cannot be given when the necessary parties are not present. Primo Levi says that an act of violence is forever irreparable and that the Nazi soldier, Karl, probably only asked for forgiveness due to his impending death and not out of his heart. This therefore raises the question of the Nazi soldier’s credibility and Levi says that Wiesenthal would have been wrong to forgive a man whose apology was insincere. I agree because I think that Karl was taking advantage of his situation, and we will never know whether it was just to clear his existential conscience or actually because it questions the Nazi’s motives for asking for forgiveness. It is a question of whether or not he meant the apology or just to have peace of mind when the opportunity presented itself as he could give the order for a Jewish person could be given to him in order to facilitate an apology. Primo Levi asks if there was actually a basis of whether or not forgiveness was warranted and how the apology would have been misguided if it was given to an insincere person. Although these three symposium contributions appear to not directly contradict each other, they do entice thought that is not just on one level, but appeal to questioning the affect and effect of an apology. While the Dalai Lama says that you should forgive and not forget, whereas Abraham J. Heschel argued that only certain people can be in an apology, and Primo Levi asks if an apology should have ever been given, they all give arguments to different specific moral questions in the text. They argue whether or not an apology was or wasn’t needed, the purpose of the said apology and how the apology could have been conveyed in a logical and moral manner. This of course does not give a succinct answer but rather a range of answers in which we can take away points from the arguments that we like and disregard other views that we see as irrelevant or immoral. The symposium helps us to gain a better understanding of the issue by presenting different subthemes all under the umbrella of forgiveness. We have gone from getting the sole point of view of Simon Wiesenthal to the many views of the symposium which allows us to understand the story with the thought-provoking entries that are provided. It is with this that the structure is important to the novel as it follows the introduction which sets up the story and helps the reader make an informed view of the book while in first-person,  and the symposium introduces new people to give their input, which is shown above with the various arguments towards the same issue, but in different ways, which enables you to gain a clearer understanding of the text. Now that the first and second sections of the novel have enabled us to see how to make an informed decision about Simon Wiesenthal’s response and our hypothetical response if we were in that situation, which is based on both the context of his situation and the importance of the situation. It has been shown above that simply having one part of the novel, either the first or the second is not complete without the other, as they both help us to understand the novel, with the context and attitudes of the times allowing us to empathise with Simon Wiesenthal in the first section and the varied knowledge and point of views of the symposium helping us to dissect specific moral judgements of the situation and together help us to make a decision of the importance and the limitations of forgiveness. By the fact that we have 53 different points of views in the symposium, we can hone in on our exact sentiment and feelings towards the issue facing Simon in a precise and logical manner. The book is structured in a way that at first we empathise with Simon and try to gain a better understanding of his situation and then we analyse the responses objectively of many scholars and academics which helps us to make an informed decision about the limits of forgiveness. The beauty of this enables us to establish that events like this are not limited to the past as explained by the Dalai Lama as he talks about genocide in Tibet. The parallel of his experiences to Simon’s reinforces some points such as not forgetting about what has happened, but also makes us think about whether or not Simon Wiesenthal should have forgiven the soldier as the Dalai Lama forgive his captors and oppressors, which only occurs because the stories are similar and they allow for interesting and thought provoking reading. The point of view of the novel enables us to first get the view and thoughts of Simon Wiesenthal where we subjectively judge his decision based on his thoughts and his words, afterwards we read through the symposium and further refine our judgements from multiple sources in an attempt to eliminate bias and come up with a more clear and concise conclusion about the possibilities and limits of forgiveness, justice and human responsibility. The structure of novels helps us to better understand them. In the novel The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal, he details his experiences  and situation first-hand which is followed by various entries about the morality of what he did and whether or not he was right in doing so. In the novel we first get introduced to Simon, a Jew who is in dire straits, working at a labour camp and is told to visit a Nazi who asks for Simon to forgive him. Simon ends up saying nothing and following this is a collection of thoughts on the issue called the symposium. This enables us to informed decision about the morality behind forgiveness and its limitations. It is with this that we get exposed to more than one point of view which helps us to debate the issue and come up with a conclusion about forgiveness. The structure of the novel enables us to formulate our arguments as does the various point of views presented to us, which helps us to determine for ourselves the possibilities and limits of forgiveness. The Sunflower free essay sample The Sunflower and having mixed emotions during this book I made my decision. â€Å"What would I have done? † I would have done the same thing you did. Just walk away from all of it. I believe it would be a tough situation to think about and have a response to right then and there. Like Deborah says in her essay, The question to be asked is not should the prisoner have forgiven the SS man but could the prisoner have forgiven him? This is obviously saying that no one has the right to forgive anyone on behalf of another. This request brings up several moral questions like, Is it alright to forgive someone who has done no harm to you? Can a person forgive someone on behalf of others? Can anyone really forgive anyone else, or is forgiveness in the hands of a higher power? The soldier asked you for his forgiveness just because you are a Jew, and in the soldiers mind, all Jews are equal. We will write a custom essay sample on The Sunflower or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Even though you weren’t burned alive, shot dead, or in any other heinous acts in the concentration camps. How could his forgiveness, had he granted it, put the soldier at rest about the hundreds of Jews he has been a party to the murder of? I think you had no right to forgive the soldier. The soldier didn’t commit a crime against you personally, and for you to forgive him would have been an empty phrase with no meaning. The soldier should have asked for forgiveness between himself and all the Jews he murdered. Sven Alkalaj I like that Sven included in his essay what he went through in Bosnia. I agree with Sven that Simon made a good decision not forgiving the soldier. Just as Sven asks in his essay, Who is entitled to speak on behalf of the victims? Simon didn’t have much of a say just because they didn’t torture him. Just like Sven says, Simon was unsure if his response to the dying soldier was okay. It was hard for Simon to get over his response and wanted other peoples opinions on his decision. When the nurse attempts to give Simon some of the soldiers possessions. Simon refuses the package. It obviously shows that he didn’t want to do much with the soldiers. The holocaust was a horrible thing, and the killing of thousands of Jews was not okay. Forgetting the crimes would be worse than forgiving the criminal who seeks forgiveness† It is such a atrocious thing, its hard to forget and Sven said it would be bad to forget everything that happened. The Dalai Lama I don’t agree with Lama. He says â€Å"one should forgive the person or persons who have committed atrocities against oneself and mankind. † I am t otally against what he says because forgiving the soldier would mean that Simon is okay with what he did. The soldier didn’t really care if the Jew was tortured or not because he just asked the nurse to find a random Jew. I felt like the soldiers apology was a lie and he just wanted to die in peace. But he doesn’t really deserve it after everything he did. Lama also says â€Å"but that is not the Buddhist way,† Lama’s culture is different and believes that forgiveness is okay. But if Simon was to forgive the soldier, it wouldn’t bring back any of the people he killed. The Jews he killed are piled up dead and accepting his apology isn’t going to change a thing. All the awful things that happened will always be in Simon’s mind. Melissa Torres Period: 6 The Sunflower In The Sunflower, by Simon Wiesenthal the main character, Simon is put in an awkward situation and doesn’t really know how to deal with it. His development from the beginning of the book to the end of the book is kind of crazy. Towards the end of this book he realizes he made the right decision. Simon just needed a little bit of extra help to decipher if what he did was right. With condoning factors supporting the Nazi in The Sunflower is asking for forgiveness both out of guilt and amends, there is no possible way to decipher if he should or should not be forgiven. Simon was asked to go clean at a hospital. When he arrived at the hospital the nurse asked him if he was a Jew. Simon said yes and the nurse took him to the bedside of Karl, a 21-year old dying Nazi soldier. Karl was covered in bandages with openings only for his mouth, nose and ears. Karl wanted to tell Simon his story. Karl talked about his childhood and then the conversation came up to him being a Nazi. Karl admitted to shooting a mother, father and their two kids. Karl felt guilty about the hundred of Jews he killed and he didn’t want to die without coming clean to a Jew. Karl asked for forgiveness, he knew he was asking for too much from Simon but without his answer Karl couldn’t die in peace. Simon left the room without a word. When he returned to the hospital the next day, the same nurse came to Simon and told him that Karl had died. Over the next years of the war, time and time again, through all his suffering, Simon thought of Karl and wondered if he should have forgiven him. Over the years, every time Simon would enter a hospital, see a nurse, or a man covered with his head bandaged, he recalls Karl. Many years later Simon questioned whether he had done the right thing. He asked many people about his actions. A few of these people included Jews, Rabbis, a Catholic Cardinal, Christians and even an ex-Nazi. They all had different opinions and different reason of forgiveness. Faced with the choice between compassion and justice, silence and truth, Simon said nothing. Simon always wondered if he had done the right thing. As the book was coming to an end, Simon started noticing that he did the right think not forgiving Karl. Forgiving him wouldn’t bring back any of the people he killed. The Jews he killed are piled up dead and accepting his apology isn’t going to change a thing. Karl didn’t commit a crime against Simon personally, and for Simon to forgive Karl would have been an empty phrase with no meaning. Karl should have asked for forgiveness between himself and all the Jews he murdered. The main character’s development throughout the book showed that at first Simon wasn’t confident with his decision and always had the situation on the back of his mind. But towards the end of the book, Simon notices he did make the right decision to just get up, walk away without saying a word. Simon basically needed other peoples opinions to see that he had done the right thing.

Womanly Words †Gyn

Womanly Words – Gyn Womanly Words Gyn Womanly Words Gyn By Sharon Well, I couldnt let the men have all the fun. English has a lot of words that contain the Greek root meaning woman or female gyn. This appears at the start or in the middle of many common words. As with the andr- words, many of these have biological or scientific origins. Heres a list to start you off: acrogynous plants having female organs at the top of the stem androgynoid a male with female features androgynous having both male and female characteristics; also applies in botany. apogynous, apogyny referring to the condition of having non working female reproductive organs calligyniaphobia a fear of beautiful women (if youre scared of all women, then you have gynephobia or gynecophobia) ergatogynous describes insects who have worker females gyneceum harem or womans house gynander woman who has male characteristics (gyndandrous refers to plants) gynarchy government run by women gynecentric regarding women as primary or central gynecium the pistil, or female part of a flower gynecogen something that stimulates female sexual characteristics (hormone) gynecology the study and treatment of diseases that affect womens reproductive systems gynogamete ovum gynoid robot shaped like a woman Many more here. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:20 Great Similes from Literature to Inspire YouWhen to Form a Plural with an ApostropheAdvance vs. Advanced

Comparing and contrasting Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Comparing and contrasting - Essay Example An even more distressing truth is, in most cases, those who seek to overthrow the government are just as corrupt as those they are trying to overthrow, if not more so. This turmoil and unrest has led to many stories being shared, via movie renditions and books. One such book that tells of a story of this unrest in Africa is, A Long Way Gone, written by Ishmael Beah. A movie that tells of another story in Africa is, Hotel Rwanda. Though this book and movie share many similarities in their telling of the turmoil, they also have their differences. By looking at the similarities and differences of the situation, the characters, and by discovering which character is more identifiable, a more inside glimpse into the tragedies, and mercies that surround the turmoil in Africa, can be seen. Similarities and Differences in the Situation To begin with it is important to note the similarities and differences in the two situations presented. A Long Way Gone, is the story of a boy who finds himsel f alone after rebels destroy his home town. He, then, is left to wander the country side, until he is finally picked up by the government army. With this army he is coerced into fighting, against the ‘rebels’ at the young age of thirteen. ... In both of these stories the government is fighting those they deem as rebels whom, they believe, would like to overthrow their leadership. In, A Long Way Gone, Ishmael, said that at a point, when fighting for the government, the lines of good versus bad became blurred. He realized that he was the one now destroying villages of innocent people and possibly taking away families from boys, like his was taken from him. Similarly in, Hotel Rwanda, many Tutsi people who ended up being killed were innocent women and children, not soldiers who were fighting. One major difference that can be seen in these two stories, however, is the fact that in A Long Way Gone, the war that was taking place was a civil war that had been fought, between two groups of people, over a long period of time. In, Hotel Rwanda, however, it was genocide, where the government ordered the complete destruction of this race, or group of mostly unarmed people, in a day. It is said that more people died in this genocide t han all the nuclear bombs ever dropped, put together. Another difference in the situation of these stories is the fact that the war in, A Long Way Gone, was, for the most part, a political one. In, Hotel Rwanda, all though it was initially made out to be a political â€Å"war†, it was mostly a genocide of a group of people because of their beliefs, they were Christians. Similarities and Differences in the Characters It is also important to note the similarities and differences of the main characters of these stories. The main character of, A Long Way Gone, is Ishmael Beah, a young village boy. The main character of, Hotel Rwanda, is Paul Rusesabagina, the assistant manager of Miles Collines Hotel. One of the major similarities between these characters is

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Essay

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke - Essay Example Thus, in a social contract to which they voluntarily consented, they created the state for the purpose of promoting and preserving their natural rights to life, liberty and property. It was John Locke who painted a picture of liberty of citizens and authority of government in tones which were far moderate than that of Thomas Hobbes. Men in a state of nature could make use of their perfect freedom for their own good, since they were reasonable men. To John Locke, men did not abuse their Liberty. They did not threaten the lives of their neighbors. He wrote: Though this is a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license. The state of nature of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason, which is that law that teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent; no one has a right to harm another in his life, health, liberty of possessions. 1 Locke's social contract favored men quitting the state of nature to form themselves into a civil society. In this society men instituted the state where a social contract or covenant was formulated between citizens and government, a trustee which they could dismiss if it did not maintain the freedom and equality that men originally knew and enjoyed. In other words, when government no longer served the citizens' interests and welfare, it might be resisted or overthrown. Why, because government had violated its obligations under the social contract to the extent that it had broken it. What were these obligations The government as trustee had to protect and preserve people's rights, especially natural rights as explained above. Otherwise, the contractual agreement which was the basis of government's existence would be without substance and meaning. Locke asserted that men should retain their natural rights in civil society and that political powers or sovereignty should not be assigned to the monarch, but to the people's representatives in parliament who should be supreme. In Locke's view, the legislative power could never be arbitrary, since under the doctrine of popular sovereignty, the people had the supreme power to change, through peaceful election or revolution, their representatives in the parliament whenever such representatives acted contrary to the trust reposed in them. Locke's social contract puts in perspective the parliamentary democracy of limited government that many states have today, which stresses the protection and promotion of individual rights to life, liberty and property. Locke's reason for favoring a civil government to impose upon man some restrictions of government authority was that men after all were not impartial judges of their friends' shortcomings. He admitted that human frailties could lead to abuse of power. 2 Popular sovereignty is supreme authority of the state which resides in the people. This authority means that the people are the ultimate source of power and so they possess coercive power to control government through which they allow themselves to be governed. It was said that sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them. This view is embodied in Locke's theory of popular sovereignty in which the citizens have the vested right and power to choose their representat